Showing posts with label Hesiodic Succession Myth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hesiodic Succession Myth. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

TFBT: The Seven Wives of Zeus II



Extinguishing Competitive Divine Lineages

“None of Charlemagne’s daughters ever married.  His biographer, Einhard, claimed that he loved his daughters so much he could not bear to part with them.  However, it is quite likely he knew that the marriage of his daughters could possibly weaken his imperial claims.”  Sarah Jane Bodell[i]  

Initially the greatest threat to Zeus reign was competing divine lineages. I suggest that Zeus’ choice of brides represents an effort to extinguish such.  

During the Titanomachy as before Oceanus and his children remained neutral in the wars of succession.  After the Titanomachy the bulk of the first and second generation male Titans were tossed into Tartarus. The children of the Titan Hyperion were struck with a passion for mortals.[ii] The lineage of the Titaness Phoebe and Titan Coeus dwindles down with their granddaughters Hecate and Artemis chosing eternal virginity and only Zeus’ and Leto’s son Apollo continuing the lineage

In order to consolidate power he weds the Titanesses Themis and Mnemosyne the solitary representatives of their lineages and Eurynome the Orphic creatrix.  (Thetis, is the Spartan creatrix.)

The Hellenistic Queen Arsinoe was wife and also sister of Ptolemy II Philadelphus, “and such unions were a strategy for consolidating power with in one family following the Egyptian model.”[iii]  

Rhea, mother to "wise Zeus, father of gods and men", “was subject in love to Cronus and bare splendid children.”  The first was Hestia who chose eternal virginity, “Demeter and gold-shod Hera” whom he wed “and strong Hades, pitiless in heart, who dwells under the earth,” where apparently the beds of the gods prove fruitless because Hades and his bride (Zeus’ daughter, Persephone) never have any universally recognized children. And finally “and the loud-crashing Earth-Shaker” (Theogony XXX)  That is to say the final divine bloodline on this list; Poseidon's.  In order to consolidate power in his own watery realm, Poseidon must conquer a list of water-goddesses, the Nereids. No other god has ever bed a Nereid because they are Pontides (descendants of ancient Pontus) and just as likely to produce monsters and godlings.  Hence Poseidon’s heir is Triton,  half god and half fish.

So, Zeus is able to consolidate power by;  extinguishing the Ancient Titan lineages with the tossing of the males into Tartarus, wedding into the surviving lineages wedding his Hyperionides cousins off to mortals, convincing female members of his household to remain virgins, marrying his sisters and tossing his brothers into realms where either reproduction is impossible or it produces only monsters.










[ii] (Apollodorus 1.27 & Metamorphoses 41.69).
[iii] (Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece, Nigel Wilson, Page 351

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

TFBT: Random Notes on Hesiod’s Cosmos


Recently I was on the road for six weeks.  I took this as a great opportunity to re-read Strauss-Clay’s great book.  She provides a close reading of each of Hesiod’s works individually and then compares and contrasts them as we see Hesiod’s concept of the cosmological process unfold.    

The Two Perspectives.   

What I didn’t remember from my last reading was Clay’s proposal that “Works and Days” is written from a mortal perspective while, “The Theogony” is for a divine audience.   (  Maya M.  suggests that " So Hesiod here has completely dissociated himself from the human viewpoint and taken the viewpoint of his divine characters. And not even of Zeus, but of his opponents. Phorkys is called "brave", like the Titans during the Titanomachy.") Clay describes the apobatic moment of the Muses departure from their bath places on Permessu or Hippocrene or Olme or dancing ground of Helicon and their arrival where Hesiod tends his sheep as “the moment of transition from the eternal time of the gods to the temporality of mankind…the Muses have arrived at the limit of the world of men…the high pastures where notoriously gods and human beings may encounter each other…In the meantime, the change in the Muses’ name and address – from Heliconian to Olympian –underlines the movement from a localize epichoric, perspective to a PanHellenic one. “  Clay juxtaposes “divine and human temporalities as past and present, eternal and ephemeral”  I would add, that even the gods are immortal, the temporality is “once and forever” whereas generations of men die and are reborn eternally.   

In Works & Days “he revises the earlier teaching of the Muses by telling us that on earth, it turns out there are two Irides – not one, as claimed in the Theogony.  What his means is that from the point of view of the gods, there is only one Eris” This might be more understandable if we recall from Hippolytus that Artemis declared the gods are not allowed to interfere with one another    “Hesiodically, Eris and Hubris precede the birth of Dike.  Dike enters the world of men only much later with the fourth race, the age of heroes.” 

 
The Alternative Theogonies
 

Clay states that “Homer and Hesiod allude to alternative theogonic traditions”, and “a developed genre of theogonic poetry”.  She lists the Homeric Hymn to Hermes in her footnotes “where Hermes enchants Apollo with his singing of a theogony which likewise recounts the birth of the gods in order and their acquisition of their allotted shares.”  She adds that “Homer seems to know of a cosmogonic model in which Oceanus and Tethys were the primordial parents.”   I would point out that the Orphic Hymn to Nyx suggests that;

 “Nyx, parent goddess, source of sweet repose, from whom at first both Gods and men arose”;

and Zeus’ awe of the goddess seems to support that thrice-prayed for, best beloved, most fair Night is a goddess of matriarchal importance.    I’ve argued elsewhere that Homer’s treatment of Thetis and Eurynome is a subtle acknowledgement to theogonies that make each of the water goddesses, creatrix in their own rights.  (See http://shortstories-bill.blogspot.com/2014/11/tfbt-homer-is-thessalian.html) 


 

The Genealogy of the Gods 

If you don’t know Hesiod’s basic premise, it is that once upon a time, there was nothing but the unfathomable abyss of Chaos.  From it arose primordial Earth (Gaea). Clay observes that Mountains, Nymphs and the barren salt Sea (Pontus) were all born of the Earth without intercourse.   With the latter she became mother of all the primordial sea gods and sea monsters, with the possible exception of Nereus who Pontus bore asexually.   Also, to Earth was born the starry Heaven Uranus. ”Uranus, the Heavens to cover or enclose her (Gaia) in all direction as if she somehow required such delimitation.”  In this position there was little opportunity for grow in the world, until Cronus emasculated his father and for the first time Hyperion (the sun) arose splitting the earth and sky.  Also spilling from the mother’s womb were 17 other primordial deities.  The drops of divine ichor that fell to Earth would engender the ash-maidens; Erinyes and giants.  His genitals tossed into the sea would generate the mighty Aphrodite.1   

Cronus becomes King of the Gods until overthrown by his son Zeus. 
 

Zeus distributes the honors and privileges of the gods among his kin and allies at Mecone.  “Zeus secures the instrument of organized violence which are characteristic of political power; an armament industry (the Cyclopes) and a mercenary army (the Hundred-Arms).”  Clay adds to this the children of the Styx.  “Zeus promised honor (time) while she in return gave Zeus the gift of her children, Violence, Power, Zeal and Victory.”    As I write this it occurs to me that Styx had no grandchildren, the first generation of Cyclops were slain without heirs and two out of the three “Hundred-arms” served as jailers in Tartarus a realm notorious for its lack of fertility.  (Note Queen Persephone’s infertility.)  Elsewhere I’ve noted the choice of virginity which is unique goddesses in Zeus’s extended family and that goddesses in the only other titan family allied to the Olympians, the Hyperionides were cursed with an obsession with mortal men.   Zeus seemed to have made a real effort to thwart the birth of an adversary.  Finally he sires a few abstractions to decorate the place.   

Meanwhile, from Chaos arose Nyx (Night) and Darkness (Erebus) who had a brood of generally unpleasant deities and daemon, the least likeable being born from Nyx’s attempt at asexual reproduction.   Maya M refers to these daemons as the “bio-weapons in Pandora’s jar”.    Clay notes Gaia’s “line remains completely separate from that of Chaos – intercourse between these two fundamentally opposed cosmic entities seems impossible.” 2     

 Prometheus the King

 So if you don’t know the story of Zeus and Prometheus; here it is.  They were cousins.  When Zeus and his sibling overthrew the Titan King and made a grab for power, Prometheus and his three brothers, the sons of Iapetus led the resistance against them.   Hesiod…makes the Iapetids appear to be the younger sons of the family of Cronus.  .. this genealogical sleight-of-hand (has to do with) the succession myth, where it is always the younger son who disposes his father.  And significantly Prometheus is the only figure who share the epithet ankulometis “of crooked – devising” with his uncle Cronus.  Prometheus either through the gift of foresight or on the advice of Themis, switches sides, bring his dullard brother Epimetheus with him.    At Mecone (see above) Prometheus arranged for the Bronze Men to get the better part of the community meal.  In revenge Zeus withholds the fire that would have cooked the meal, Prometheus steals it from the gods, the gods withdraw the easy living that required no farming and burden men with Pandora, the first woman who brings all the illness of the world as a dowry to her husband Epimetheus. 

Clays asks “Why did he take up the cause of mankind?”  Clay suggests that the crafty Titan took up the mortal cause in order to court them as allies in his own bid for power.  He ends up leaving “mankind permanently unable to escape its human condition, a condition founded on the institutions of sacrifice, agriculture and marriage and predicated on Hope.”   

 
_______________________________________________

1  Clay’s foot note to the castration of Uranus and the release of his children from Gaia’s womb “Hesiod seems to be punning on locos, “ambush” and the root loc-, relating to child-birth”    A similar pun is reported on the soldiers issuing from the belly of the Trojan Horse   

2   Well, at least until  Iliad 14. 231 when Hera weds Nyx’s son Hypnos to one of the Graces.

Friday, November 8, 2013

TFBT: Homer Gives a Nod to Hesiod


Walking home from work yesterday, it occurred to me that if we accept Emily Schurr's Subtext, there might be broader implications about Homer and Hesiod.  Let’s look at some examples of Homer giving a nod to other epic traditions.

In "The Best of Achaeans" Nagy points out that Homer gives a nod to the group of myths about Aeneas (the future Aeneid) when the gods whisk him of the battle field for the sake of his future epic.[1] 

I think we can infer the power of Thetis in the Iliad, that she is someone special.  Thetis can turn the Will of Zeus with a touch to the chin, unbind supernatural bonds, summon forces far greater than the combined strength of the Olympians and do it all without a complaint from her opponents to her face.  Maybe that great favor afforded to a mere mermaid is Homer's nod to Spartan poet Alcman's creation myth in which Thetis is the creatrix.[2]

By her association with mighty Thetis, Eurynome would be Homer's nod to "Orpheus" who makes Eurynome one of the primordial gods. [3]

“Monro's Law” which states that the Odyssey “never repeats or refers to any incident related in the Iliad." [4] would suggest that the composer of the Iliad was showing respect to the Odyssey by not trespassing on it. 

Hera’s visit (Iliad 14.200) to Oceanus and Tethys (from who all the gods proceed) could be a nod to a theogony we are not even aware of. (Also Iliad 14. 244)

Okay, having tossed all that out as example, let me ask the question.  Does Schurr's subtext represent a Homeric nod to the Hesiodic Succession myth?    I can’t find in the Iliad anywhere that Homer is as clear about the succession myth as Schurr's subtext suggests .  I am not suggesting Homer is giving a nod to the Theogony, but rather to the collection of myths that Hesiod chose from in composing his own epic. 



[1] Best of the Achaeans, Gregory Nagy 15.3  “There is a conflict going on here between Achilles and Aeneas as warriors in battle and also between the epic traditions about each of the two heroes. Moreover, the Iliad here is actually allowing part of the Aeneas tradition to assert itself at the expense of the Achilles tradition”
 
[2] Page 179,  Knox, Bernard M. W., “Archaic Choral Lyric,” in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol I. Greek Literature, ed. P.E. Easterling. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 1989  Also “The Power of Thetis” (Hellenic Studies) Laura M. Slatkin. Page 82
 
[3] Pseudo-Apollodorus, Bibliotheca 1. 503 :"He [Orpheus] sang of . . . How, in the beginning, Ophion and Eurynome, daughter of Oceanus, governed the world from snow-clad Olympus; how they were forcibly supplanted, Ophion by Cronus, Eurynome by Rhea; of their fall into the waters of Okeanos."
 
[4] http://laudatortemporisacti.blogspot.com/2011_09_01_archive.html   by Michael Gilleland, scroll down to “Monro’s Law” Excellent article. Also Monro, 1901 “Homer’s Odyssey” page 325

Thursday, November 7, 2013

TFBT: Schurr’s Subtext in the Introduction to the Iliad

I recently stumbled upon “Recreating the Creation: Reading between the Lines in the Proem of the Iliad”  by Emily Schurr at the Center for Hellenic Studies website.  

 First let me say, “What great writing!  I love her style and her clarity.  Amazement and delight crowned  both the quality of her writing and the content. That said, “Wow!  She gave me a headache!”  But it was a good headache, sort of like a brain-freeze on a hot day.  The solution in both cases was the same, take a smaller bite and give it a chance to digest before greedily going for the next delicious tidbit.  Her observation on the unnamed goddess in the first line of Homer’s epic, The Iliad amazed me.

Her whole argument is about a subtle subtext in the opening of the epic Iliad is eloquent, insightful and thought provoking.  The Iliad composed by Homer opens like this;  

“The wrath sing, goddess, of Peleus' son, Achilles, that destructive wrath which brought countless woes upon the Achaeans, and sent forth to Hades many valiant souls of heroes, and made them themselves spoil for dogs and every bird; thus the plan of Zeus came to fulfillment, from the time when first they parted in strife Atreus' son, king of men, and brilliant Achilles.”  (translated by A. T. Murray)  

 

The above  is sort of an executive summary presented by Homer.  In the same seven lines he also upon the presumably the Muses for inspiration .  They are the goddesses of the arts and Clio goddess of epic in particular. 


Emily Schurr says “ After more than two thousand years of scholarship, countless commentaries, publications and lectures, one might very well ask if there is anything more to be mined from these seven over-studied lines. It is my intention to argue that there is…previously undiscovered, and highly meaningful, subtext.”  What she is suggesting is that Homer’s opening remarks are arranged in such a way to remind us of other stories and to imply a few things about his epic song without actually saying it.   

She points out that, in the first line alone, we have a goddess, (who will sing the plot of the Iliad and the story of Achilles) ; the son, (with wrath of cosmic consequences) and a father. Such three closely grouped characters might  hint at a family, because Achilles' mother  Thetis  is a goddess.  And Thetis is famous for singing laments for her son throughout the Iliad.   More on this later.   

The next character to enter these famous seven lines with  the  “goddess and son, united in their song-plot and anger” is  Zeus whose “plan is in the process of being fulfilled, of which theirs is a part”  If we are looking for subtley here we could envision Zeus as an alternative father figure in this “happy family”. 

For line 7, Schurr suggests that in Anciet Greek the phrase “from the time when first”  sounds like “from that time in the beginning”   To use an ancient disclaimer: I have not Greek.   I cannot comment.  But if I had noticed earlier on that Homer was specific about the names of the three male characters and notable not of the female character  I might start wondering about the rest of this introduction.  

Schurr then spends the next two pages explaining the Hesiodic Succession Myth.  Hesiod was the poet that told about the first of the great sky gods; Uranus.  Uranus knew that one of his sons would over throw him and take over the rule of the universe.  So, he kept all his children by the earth goddess Gaea in the womb.  There were eighteen children; several of them of monstorous size.  The youngest son Cronus with the help of his mother finally over threw his father.  Same prophecy applied to the security of his throne, so he kept all his six children in his belly by swallowing them at birth.  His youngest Zeus with the help of his own mother and grandmother Earth  over threw Cronus.  Same prophecy applied to Zeus’ uneasy crown.  So, he swallowed his first wife Metis when she became pregnant.  Guess what?  Wrong wife.  The product of that union was the goddess Athena.   

There was a still a potential male heir out there; Achilles.  If Zeus bedded Thetis Achilles would overthrow him, so Thetis was married to the mortal Peleus to avoid the danger.   Schurr says  “The parallels to the cosmic succession struggle seem to be simply too strong to miss.” She has uncovered the plot narrative of the subtext. It is, the story of the primordial conflict  of earth goddess  and sky god, with the mother's opposition to her husband's will and  her patronage of the son's quest for sovereignty over the universe.  “In other words, the entire struggle for succession is played out in a mere six lines of poetry,” 

But, being mortal Achilles quest is doomed to fail. Zeus will win out in the contest for universal domination and for the plot of the Iliad. But…”the fact that the potentiality for an alternative interpretation is left open - that the Muse is not specifically signalled, despite the fact that every other invocation in the Iliad addresses them directly (suggests that another goddess) may also be felt….Now, singing goddesses, once we start looking beyond the Muse, are often extremely dangerous”  Schurr goes on list the striking similarities between the Metis of the Hesiod’s  succession myth and Thetis in further proof of what could have been.  

Schurr concludes that Homer formulates the subliminal archetype “roles of creative mother, retributive son and transgressive father”  then opens the Iliad by “invoking the creative powers of the goddess and the menis of the son, endowing them with power in the language of their cosmic parallels; but they turn out to be mere shadows of their alter egos, unable to uphold the challenge to Zeus, unable to turn the narrative to their advantage.”