If a man’s brother or son has been killed, that man
will accept a blood-price as
compensation for the one who was killed, and the one who caused the death,
having paid a vast sum, can remain in the locale while the other one’s heart
and manly feeling are checked, now that
he has accepted the blood-price
Iliad IX:632
Portrayal
of compensation (poine) or maybe I
should say the ritual of compensation seems to follow a set pattern in the
Homeric literature;
(1)
There
is a conflict between two parties.
(2)
Some
people die.
(3) There is an
offer of compensation to resolve the conflict.
(4) The offer is refused.
(5) Other people
die.
(6) More talk of compensation.
(7) Divine intervention.
(8) The conflict
ends.
So
(1) Agamemnon and Achilles argue over Briesis. (Iliad 1:200)
(2) In the Iliad 1:1, most famously “sent forth to Hades many valiant souls of
heroes, and made them spoil for dogs and every bird”
(3)
Agamemnon offered) seven tripods, ten talents of gold, twenty gleaming cauldrons, twelve strong
horses, seven women, Brieses (Iliad
9:260) and his own daughter, and seven well established cities (149).
(4)
“I will be appeased neither by Agamemnon
son of Atreus nor by any other of the Danaans “ (Iliad 9: 315)
(5)
Patroculus dies.
(6)
“I will give you all that radiant
Odysseus offered you yesterday in your tents”
(7)
Iris tells Achilles to give up sulking in his tent and go rescue Patrolculus’
body (Iliad18:170) and
(8)
Achilles accepts the compensation and the social order is restored. (Iliad 19:145)
In
the Odyssey (1) Odysseus disagrees with
the suitors about Penelope.
(2)
The leader of the suitors is struck in the throat with an arrow 22: 15
(3) “We
will make everything good among ourselves in the district, and pay you in full
for all that we have eaten and drunk. Each one of us shall pay you a fine worth
twenty oxen, and we will keep on giving you gold and bronze till your heart is
softened. Until we have done this no one can complain of your being enraged
against us.” Odyssey 22:55
(4)
“Resourceful Odysseus again glared at him
and said, “Though you should give me all that you have in the world both now
and all that you ever shall have, I will not stay my hand till I have paid all
of you in full”. Iliad 22:60
(5) The rest of the suitors die.
(6) “As for the sheep and goats which the wicked
suitors have eaten, I will take many myself by force from other people, and
will compel the Achaeans to make good the rest till they shall have filled all
my yards.” Odyssey 23:355
(7) “Athena,
so she said to Odysseus, “Odysseus, noble son of Laertes and seed of Zeus, stop
this strife.” (Odyssey 24:538)
(8) “Then Athena, daughter of Zeus of the aegis
assumed the form and voice of Mentor, and presently made a covenant of peace
between the two contending parties.”
(Odyssey 24:546)
Likewise
1) Achilles and Hector strove over the killing of Patroculus. 2) Hector is fatally wounded. 3) “I
pray you by your life and knees, and by your parents, let not dogs devour me at
the ships of the Achaeans, (22:340) but accept the rich treasure of gold and
bronze which my father and mother will offer you, and send my body home” 4)
Achilles refuses. 5) Hector dies. 6) There’s a lot of talk about the compensation
among the gods 7) Thetis tells Achilles
to accept the ransom. 8) Achilles accepts the ransom from Priam. “He would be crying for Patroklos. And the
sounds of lament rose up all over the dwelling. But when Achilles was now sated
with grief and had unburdened the bitterness of his sorrow,” (Iliad 24:512)
Naturally, the story Phoenix tells during the Embassy
scene comes to mind. In order to
convince Achilles to accept compensation he tells him the story of Meleagros. However,
our analysis so far betrays the fallacy in Phoenix’s argument. Meleagros is not in conflict with those
offering him fifty acres of vineyard and farmland on the most fertile plain of
lovely Calydon. In fact “he was angry in his heart at his dear mother
Althaea “ (Iliad 9:555) So,
Meleagros wasn’t being offered compensation, but rather a bribe according to
our analysis of the ritual of compensation
I think the conflict between Zeus and Prometheus, as presented by Aeschylus, generally fits the same scheme, with some modifications:
ReplyDelete(1) There is a conflict between two parties.
(2) The weaker party suffers.
(3) There is an offer of compensation to resolve the conflict.
(4) The offer is refused.
(5) Both parties suffer.
(6) Presumably more talk of compensation, though we lack direct data.
(7) Third-party (mortal) intervention.
(8) The conflict ends.
Good comment Maya. Maybe i should look for application in other scenarios. thanks Bill
Delete