Elsewhere
I have spoke with much affection about Charles Mills Gayley’s “The Classic Myths in English Literature and in
Art, Based Originally on Bulfinch's.” It rained heavily this weekend, the ditches
are full of running water. Even my Black Labrador dreads going outside for a
walk. With time on my hands and no
current book club at Hour 25 I searched my bookshelf for something fun to
re-read. I chose Gayley’s
Commentaries. Keep in mind that Gayley’s
master piece was published in 1893. Believe
me when I say that research and thought on Greek mythology has come a long ways
since then. Allegorical interpretation
was all the rage in his day. Gayley
without too much comment offers up all the most popular interpretations of each
god or myth discussed. However, two thirds of the way through is commentaries
he says;
“Of the stories
told in these and the following sections no systematic, allegorical, or
physical interpretations are here given, because ;
- the general method followed by the unravelers of myth has already been sufficiently illustrated;
- the attempt to force symbolic conceptions into the longer folk-stories, or into the artistic myths and epics of any country, is historically unwarranted and, in practice, is only too often capricious; and
- the effort to interpret such stories as the Iliad and the Odyssey must result in destroying those elements of unconscious simplicity and romantic vigor that characterize the early products of the creative imagination”
But
it was too late a determination for me as a youthful reader. My own thoughts on Greek myth were already
contaminated by the solar theory of Max Muller’s and Sir G. W. Cox's theories on
clouds, forever merged in my mind into “Solare Cattle” theories.
Here
are a few insights offered up by Gayley;
- “Deucalion was represented as the only survivor of the flood, but still the founder of the race (Greek laós), which he created by casting stones (Greek lâes) behind him."
- “Overbeck insists that the loves of Zeus are deities of the earth: "The rains of heaven (Zeus) do not fall upon the moon.”
- “Sprung forth a Pallas, arm'd and undefiled" Byron
- “Leto, according to ancient interpreters, was night,—the shadow, therefore, of Hera, if Hera be the splendor of heaven.”
- Aphrodite "she is, also, the sweetly smiling, laughter-loving, bright, golden, fruitful, winsome, flower-faced, blushing, swift-eyed, golden-crowned.”
- Hestia “She is "first of the goddesses," the holy, the chaste, the sacred.”
- “Hades is called also the Illustrious, the Many-named, the Benignant, Polydectes or the Hospitable.”
- “Lower than the sons of Heaven: lower than the Titans, sons of Uranus (Heaven), who were plunged into Tartarus.”
- The serpents that draw Medea's chariot "are part of the usual equipage of a witch, symbolizing wisdom, foreknowledge, swiftness, violence, and Oriental mystery.”
- “Preller says Minos "is the solar king and hero of Crete; his wife, Pasiphaë, is the moon (who was worshiped in Crete under the form of a cow); and the Minotaur is the lord of the starry heavens which are his labyrinth.” To add some support here Aaron Atsma says; “The Minotauros' proper name Asterion, the starry one.”
He tells the story of the Sibyl. I re-print
it for your benefit. Knowing this tale saved my wife and I $5,000
dollars at the second round of negotiations for our current home;
“The Sibyl. The following legend of the Sibyl is fixed at a later date.
In the reign of one of the Tarquins there appeared before the king a woman who
offered him nine books for sale. The king refused to purchase them, whereupon
the woman went away and burned three of the books, and returning offered the
remaining books for the same price she had asked for the nine. The king again
rejected them; but when the woman, after burning three books more, returned and
asked for the three remaining the same price which she had before asked for the
nine, his curiosity was excited, and he purchased the books. They were found to
contain the destinies of the Roman state. They were kept in the temple of
Jupiter Capitolinus, preserved in a stone chest, and allowed to be inspected
only by especial officers appointed for that duty, who on great occasions
consulted them and interpreted their oracles to the people.”
Gayley’s commentaries also discuss the Harmony of the Spheres;
“In the center of the universe (as Pythagoras taught) there was a central
fire, the principle of life. The central fire was surrounded by the earth, the
moon, the sun, and the five planets. The distances of the various heavenly
bodies from one another were conceived to correspond to the proportions of the
musical scale.”
Does this bear any relations to Bode's
Law? The formula suggests that, extending outward,
each planet would be approximately twice as far from the Sun as the one before.
The hypothesis correctly anticipated the orbits of the asteroid belt and Uranus,